Aquinas and Citing Authorities

| | Comments (3)

In a long post about a lot of unrelated things, Joe Carter includes a quote from Peter van Inwagen's God, Knowledge, & Mystery about philosophers and theologians in terms of citing authorities:

One advantage philosophers bring to theology is that they know too much about philosophy to be overly impressed by the fact that a particular philosopher has said this or that. Philosophers of the present day know what Thomas Aquinas and Professor Bultmann did not know: that no philosopher is an authority. Philosophers know that if you want to pronounce on, say, the project of natural theology, you cannot simply appeal to what Kant has established about natural theology. You cannot do this for the very good reason that Kant has established nothing about natural theology. Kant has only offered arguments, and the cogency of these arguments can be (and is daily) disputed.

It's been a long time since I read that book, and I don't remember this quote. It was at the very beginning of my graduate studies, almost a decade ago. So seeing this quote now, with all I've learned since, makes me cringe in ways I would not have thought to do so when I read that section of the book.

Thomas Aquinas would no more have assumed that you could cite a famous philosopher as an authority in this way than any philosopher today would, and anyone who thinks he would knows very little about Aquinas, with all due respect to van Inwagen. Aquinas' main methodology in his largest and most significant work is to state a question, present objections to his view, some of which are from previous figures, a biblical text, or a contemporary figure, state his own view, often citing a similar authority but not always, and then argue for his view before finally responding to the objections. He did not cite authorities as if that proved anything. He gives reasons. He did not take authorities to be a sign of the truth of anything, since the authorities appear just as much in the objections he's responding to as they do in the statement of his own view.

I don't know about Bultmann, and I don't know which contemporary theologians he has in mind (although the ones I know give actual arguments and don't generally take famous figures as substitutes), but it takes someone very unfamiliar with a giant of the tradition to say this about Aquinas, and it disappoints me to find one of the top philosophers of our day saying it of him.

3 Comments

Greetings!

You are completely right about Thomas, and van Inwagen is completely wrong on this point. As a scholar of the Angelic Doctor, I am immensely pleased that you recognized this and brought it to the attention of your readers. Bravo!

Grace & peace,
- David

You are certainly right about Aquinas, but van Inwagen is, quite clearly, exaggerating for effect. The essay starts off with a discussion of Bultmann's famous claim that no one who listens to the radio can believe in miracles, an ex cathedra pronouncement if there ever was one. Inwagen is mostly pointing out that the argument comes unaccompanied by any argument beyond a reference to what "moderns know", and pointing out that philosophers are trained to look beyond the confident statement to try to find the argument presented to support it.

It seems to me to be definitely the case that theologians often argue by appeal to "what everyone agrees is true", without bothering to construct arguments. As in "this verse is clearly redactional" or "can we still believe in divine providence after the Holocaust?" As TV lawyers would say, such statements assume facts not in evidence, and often collapse upon closer examination.

Fernando

I'm not saying that there aren't claims that people make based on authority or that there aren't claims people make for no good reason. I'm saying that his portrayal of Aquinas is pretty awful. It's not remotely fair to Aquinas to say something like this, even if you're exaggerating.

Leave a comment

Contact

    The Parablemen are: , , and .

Archives

Archives

Books I'm Reading

Fiction I've Finished Recently

Non-Fiction I've Finished Recently

Books I've Been Referring To

I've Been Listening To

Games I've Been Playing

Other Stuff

    jolly_good_blogger

    thinking blogger
    thinking blogger

    Dr. Seuss Pro

    Search or read the Bible


    Example: John 1 or love one another (ESV)





  • Link Policy
Powered by Movable Type 5.04