Forcing the Roman Catholic Church to allow female priests

| | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (1)

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation had a radio commentary yesterday which made some rather alarming suggestions. You can get the transcript here.

Here are some excerpts from the introduction:

Men and women within the Roman Catholic faith are still hoping that the church can change to more accurately reflect the World in which we live. This week-end, for example, an international conference will be held in Ottawa to support women's equality in religions. WOW, or Women's Ordination Worldwide, is fighting for the ordination of women in all Christian Churches. It says it wants to open a global debate on the issue. ... Bob Ferguson is a retired professor from the Royal Military College. He believes that Catholics are unlikely ever to see changes in policy on birth control or on the question of married or female priests. In fact, he says change won't come until the churches are forced to comply with the same human rights legislation that affects the rest of society.

The rest of the commentary is from Ferguson, who goes on to argue that churches should be forced to comply. Here are some further excerpts:

Couldn't we insist that human rights, employment and consumer legislation apply to them [the Roman Catholic Church] as it does other organizations? Then it would be illegal to require a particular marital status as a condition of employment or to exclude women from the priesthood.

Of course the Vatican wouldn't like the changes, but they would come to accept them in time as a fact of life in Canada. Indeed I suspect many clergy would welcome the external pressure.

We could also help the general cause of religious freedom by introducing a code of moral practice for religions. They will never achieve unity so why not try for compatibility? Can't religious leaders agree to adjust doctrine so all religions can operate within the code?
I won't try to propose what might be in the new code except for a few obvious things: A key item would have to be a ban on claims of exclusivity. It should be unethical for any RRP [Registered Religious Practitioner, which he's suggestiong] to claim that theirs was the one true religion and believers in anything else or nothing were doomed to fire and brimstone.

I hope this is some kind of a joke. I suppose it's also possibly designed to make conservatives/religious folks respond with outrage, then poke fun at how alarmist they are. But the program is listed right on CBC radio's main page, here (until it scrolls off), so it's hard to imagine how it could be a joke.

If it's not a joke, it's extremely concerning. I mean, to force religious people to be subject to anti-discrimination laws, to require them not to say that other religions are wrong, etc.? It seems like this would quickly put churches in the absurd position of being legally required to hire ministers who do not believe their religion, etc.

UPDATE: Related thoughts, and more commentary, here.

UPDATE 2: Jollyblogger has more on the subject (and more links).

1 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Forcing the Roman Catholic Church to allow female priests.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

The CBC has put out a feeler for the idea of state takeover of all religious activities in Canada. Details here and here. Since the CBC is run by the Canadian government, this essentially means that an arm of the Canadian government has broached the ... Read More


It almost seems to be taken for granted in the media here in the UK that religious people must know deep down that their beliefs are false.

So religious people are expected not to make truth claims, or allow their beliefs to affect the way they behave or speak in public, or to engage in joint worship with those who hold mutually imcompatible views.

But this should not surprise us. Those with power and influence have always wanted a tame church that poses no threat and offers no critique of them.

The problem from the CBC commentary is that Can we trust the society elites in all their decisions? Can we trust the media in all its reporting? Can we trust the media commentators in all their opinions? The fact that we allow different voices, espcially the religious voice in their conscience, is a good thing for the democratic society appears to be missed by the commentator. Well, the CBC does not seem to be fair and balanced.

That's true. Society benefits from free speech (and even disagreement), but unfortunately Canada seems to be losing sight of this. This editorial isn't isolated; it occurs in the wake of regulation against "hate speech" which can probably include things like Biblical sermons which mention homosexuality, etc.

Leave a comment


    The Parablemen are: , , and .



Books I'm Reading

Fiction I've Finished Recently

Non-Fiction I've Finished Recently

Books I've Been Referring To

I've Been Listening To

Games I've Been Playing

Other Stuff


    thinking blogger
    thinking blogger

    Dr. Seuss Pro

    Search or read the Bible

    Example: John 1 or love one another (ESV)

  • Link Policy
Powered by Movable Type 5.04