Fact-Checking About Abortion Rates and Judicial Nominees

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (1)

Factcheck.org tackles the claim popularized by Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Howard Dean that abortion rates have gone up under Bush. Nationally speaking, that claim is simply false, though in a few states the rate has increased. [hat tip: Susan Olasky at World, though I'm not sure her claim that these people were lying is justified]

They've also tackled some false and misleading claims from both sides on the judicial nominees who have garnered much attention of late. They end with something that I think is wrong. Alberto Gonzales once said that one opinion Priscilla Owen wrote would have been an unconscionable act of judicial activism if her opinion had been the majority opinion. He has now said that he's never accused her of being an activist judge. They raise the specter of contradiction here without quite endorsing it. I just think that's poor journalism. There's an easy way to reconcile these two statements. In the first case he was talking about an action, and in the second he was talking about a character trait. He never accused her of having the character trait of judicial activism, though he did think one opinion she wrote would have been an instance of judicial activism (if it had been a majority opinion). I don't think one instance of judicial activist makes someone an activist judge. One must have a track record of judicially activist decisions to be an activist judge.

1 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Fact-Checking About Abortion Rates and Judicial Nominees.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://movabletype.ektopos.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/528

Politicians from Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Howard Dean have recently contended that abortions have increased since George W. Bush took office in 2001. This claim is false. Read More

2 Comments

So, other than activist Judge Owen, can you name any judges who have a 'record' of the sort of activism you complain about?

And if you can name them, can you tell us what percentage of their authored decisions fit this category of "activist?"

I can think of a few activist judges, but they're all wacko conservatives. Roy Moore is out of office, thank God! Harvey Wilkinson still sits on the Fourth Circuit. Are these the guys you're worried about?

I can't for the life of me figure out what you think you're responding to, but it obviously has nothing to do with my post. I don't see any statement in this post that claims that there are any activist judges, never mind anything that counts as a complaint or worry about such judges. I certainly don't see any claims that I can name any or that I think the term 'activist' is precise enough to be able to assign a percentage of authored decisions that would make someone fit the category.

Leave a comment

Contact

    The Parablemen are: , , and .

Archives

Archives

Books I'm Reading

Fiction I've Finished Recently

Non-Fiction I've Finished Recently

Books I've Been Referring To

I've Been Listening To

Games I've Been Playing

Other Stuff

    jolly_good_blogger

    thinking blogger
    thinking blogger

    Dr. Seuss Pro

    Search or read the Bible


    Example: John 1 or love one another (ESV)





  • Link Policy
Powered by Movable Type 5.04