Usually when anything at Powerline has any decent criticism, there's a whole raft of trackbacks from critics, but as I write this there are none on this post. The Associated Press reported Donald Rumsfeld as cutting off questions of soldiers about armor with the line "You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have." That's just completely dishonest, and a quick skim of the transcript makes that fairly obvious. Rumsfeld answered the question, and as far as I can tell he answered it adequately. He said it wasn't a matter of not funding anything enough. It's just logistics. You can only do so much when you start with the military you start with. Production and capability can only go so fast. As the transcript punctuates it, there are eight more sentences following the line the AP claimed he brusquely used to cut off complaints, and on both sides of that statement were answers to the question. He said he didn't hear the question and asked the soldier to repeat it. He let the solder repeat the whole thing. That's one way to cut off a complaint. Then he gave a lengthy statement addressing all the soldier's complaints. That's a way to cut off complaints brusquely. By framing this as a one-liner and making it sound as if he moved on immediately without answering the question, whoever wrote this AP piece demonstrated true incompetence in reporting the news and true excellence in biased manipulation of the information at hand to try to get a false impression across. I can't understand why any news organization continues to rely on the AP given their track record for this sort of thing.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Search
Contact
-
The Parablemen are:
,
, and
.
Recent Comments
- Jeremy Pierce commented on AP Dishonesty: I believe
- ArnoldH commented on AP Dishonesty: The Associ
Blogroll
Evangel | A First Things Blog
Uncle Sam's Cabin
The Prosblogion
My Picture Blog
Boston Bible Geeks
Crossroads (Jan Crawford)
If Only I Had Super Powers....
The Gnuvemberist
Between Two Worlds
C. Orthodoxy
The Volokh Conspiracy
SCOTUSblog
Gender, Race and Philosophy
Thoughts Arguments and Rants
La Shawn Barber's Corner
word and spirit
Election Projection
Alexander Pruss's Blog
LTI Blog
In Socrates' Wake
Kenny Pearce
GeekPress
GetReligion
Waving Hands
Ancient Hebrew Poetry
A True Believer's Blog
Really Random Rants
Stereo Describes My Scenario
538: Electoral Projections Done Right
Race 4 2012
The Bible Archive
Cobb: Strictly Old School
GetReligion
Bench Memos
Joseph Mallozzi
ScrappleFace
There is Some Truth in That
Language Log
Philosophy, et cetera
PHILREL WEBLOG
Intellectuelle
La Shawn Barber’s Corner
The Buck Stops Here
truegrit
Fantasy Fiction for Christians
He Lives
Think Tonk
Certain Doubts
Non-Blog Sites
- Trinity Fellowship
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
- Denver Journal (Review: Biblical/Theological Studies)
- Biblical Studies Bulletin
- Catalyst: Contemporary Evangelical Perspectives
- Numavox (Kerry Livgren)
- Proto-Kaw
- Kansas
- Neal Morse
- GateWorld
- Terry Brooks
- The L-Space Web (Terry Pratchett)
- Blog Carnival Submission Form
- Christian Carnival
- List of Christian Carnivals
- Philosophers' Carnival
- Biblical Studies Carnival
- BugMeNot
- The Holy Observer
- snopes.com: myths and urban legends
- BoardGameGeek
- Fair Play Games
- Rock Paper Scissors Spock Lizard
- TinyURL.com
- David Chalmers' list of philosophy blogs
Games I've Been Playing
- Uno (Sophia and I each won)
- Gnu's Red Riding Hood Dice Adventure Game
- Last Word (Sophia and I each won)
- Variation on Hearts (I won)
- Crazy Eights (I won)
- Carcassonne with Carcassonne: Inns & Cathedrals, Carcassonne: Traders & Builders, and Carcassonne: The Princess & The Dragon (Tim Albert and Mark Quick tied for the win)
- Carcassonne (I won)
- War (card game) (Sophia won)
- The Settlers of Catan (Sam won)
- Chutes and Ladders (Ethan won)
- Scramble (Wink won two, Bonnie Lindblom won two, Carl Burdick won one, and Bill Carroll won another)
- Go Wacky! (Sophia and I each won)
- Citadels (Sam won)
- Chutes and Ladders (Sophia won)
- Scrabble (Paul K won)
Powered by Movable Type
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.









































































The Associated Press is not simply dishonest. I and others believe AP employees may be complicit in murders. See, for instance, http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2004/12/haifa-street-execution-of-iraqi.html
I believe there was a link to something on this at the Powerline piece I linked in the post. As far as I'm aware, it's perfectly consistent with everything we know that one AP employee had some contact with one terrorist and may have arranged for what the AP employee thought was going to be a demonstration and not a murder. Your speculation is way beyond the evidence.